I have been thinking about curriculum design in science (again), recently. As a team, we are taking the time this term to reflect on the year passed, the end of year data coming in and critically evaluating our own practice, from implementation to pedagogy and beyond.
Today, I paused to consider a question that’s been nagging at me; What does it mean to be scientifically educated — as opposed to simply having a science education?
And I realised, we often use the terms interchangeably.
“She had a good science education.”
“He’s scientifically literate.”
But they aren’t the same thing.
A science education is what you receive; the content, the textbooks, the practicals, the grades. It’s the periodic table, Newton’s laws, and all the exam specifications that need to be followed. It’s structured, measurable, delivered; has some added sprinkles of skills and creativity, but mostly, it’s about learning to perform in a certain way to achieve a certain output; the grade.
To be scientifically educated, though, that’s different.
That’s a mindset. A way of seeing the world.
It’s the ability to ask sharp questions.
To spot flawed logic.
To weigh evidence.
To accept uncertainty.
To change your mind when better evidence appears. In other words, be adaptable; standing solid in evidence, but not closed to taking new positions when new data becomes available.
It is also to be creative; to use the known theory to construct exploration to find the unknown. To become the architect of your own learning experiences.
Being scientifically educated means understanding how knowledge is built and why it sometimes shifts. It means resisting black and white thinking. It means developing humility and curiosity in equal measure.
Memorising scientific facts doesn’t make you a scientific thinker.
Engaging with how science works; that’s where the real education begins.
Why It Matters
In THE age of misinformation, echo chambers, instant answers, and a rapidly changing landscape; we need to nurture citizens who can reason, not just recall; who can explore, not just explain and who know how to ask, “How do we know this, and what don’t we know yet?”
This isn’t about replacing curriculum or saying no to exams. Exams have a purpose and a place for existence. But maybe what we assess and why is out of step with what society needs.
Our Middle Years is where we find some flexibility; a space to shift the focus from content delivery to cognitive empowerment.
How do we do this? In our planning and review, we considered thoughtfully shifting science education from content delivery to cognitive empowerment.
Research.
We research what is current, what’s happening in the real world, and bring it in to the classroom. Yes, we have been doing this for a long time, or at least trying to. But we need to go beyond this token addition to the classroom. We design structures that don’t just teach science, but use science as a way to think, ask, argue, and create across all subjects.
We build in opportunities for students to become the mindset.
Because the future doesn’t need more people who’ve passed science.
It needs more people who think scientifically and know when it matters most.
Leave a comment